facebook ProBoards twitter tumblr RSS feed YouTube

Weekly Poll

Will you be at the Eagle football season opener against Savannah State this Saturday?
 
Bill Ayers Speaks Out PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sade Oshinubi   
Tuesday, 10 February 2009 21:42
Bill Ayers expressed discontentment with the administration of Georgia Southern University after the Monday cancelation of his lecture scheduled for March.

“I find it outrageous on the part of the administration,” Ayers said.

An official campus statement of cancelation was issued Monday, and the university said Ayers was notified by phone the same day.

“It seems that they have bowed and caved into the will of a mob,” Ayers said. “And if they did that, they should be ashamed.”

The University attributes the cancelation to the possibility of nearly $13,000 in security expenditures—expenses the Vice President of Student Affairs Teresa Thompson said would disrupt university operations.

Some students complained about their student fees going to the event and responded by creating Facebook groups, commenting on GADaily.com, and sending e-mails to the university’s administration. “I don’t think an unrepentant domestic terrorist should be allowed to speak on our student fees, especially in this economy,” said Junior Luke Parks. “It’s not about ‘free speech’ so much as it’s more about ‘fee speech.’”
Prior to the cancelation of the event, Multicultural Student Center Director Consuela Ward said $1,585 of Student Activity Fees was going toward the event.

“I’m not bringing him because he’s a Weathermen; I’m bringing him to talk about access to education for students,” Ward said.

Dixon Smith, an alumnus from the 1980s said the cancellation was no triumph for free speech.

“That said I am delighted that this angry, violent man is not receiving student funds and will not spread his version of the truth at my Alma Mater,” Smith said. “However, rejoicing in this man’s silence reeks of censorship.”

Ayers said he was delighted to speak to students at Saint Mary’s College on Jan. 28 amid protestors who demonstrated outside the event and interrupted his speech. No violent actions occurred during his visit.

Saint Mary’s President Ron Gallagher told the Contra Costa Times that “to live up to our great tradition, we must remain an academic community where the free and open discussion of ideas, even those with which we strongly disagree, is possible.”

Because Saint Mary’s is a private school, it was not required to disclose the expenses of the Ayers event.

“[Saint Mary’s] stood for academic freedom,” Ayers said. “Your administration did not show courage. It responded with cowardice.”

Senior Lance Sullivan, who joined one of the Facebook groups, said he was happy the event was cancelled.

“Bill Ayers may be a respected professor and author to some people now, but that doesn’t excuse the horrible acts he has committed in the past,” said Sullivan.

 Ayers has spoken at GSU in previous years, mainly in conjunction with GSU’s education department.

“As a doctorial student in Curricular Studies, I’m disappointed,” said Professor Mark Mohr. “I have talked to him several times, and every time, it has been a joy.”

Ayers is on Mohr’s doctoral committee and has been on dissertation committees for GSU students pursuing doctorial studies since 2003.

“To silence a noted education scholar from speaking is a real loss for our students and our democratic educational process,” said Mohr. “I wish another solution could be found for the benefit of the university and those who want to learn.”

Professor of Curriculum Ming Fang He also worked closely with Ayers and said she was disappointed with the “distortions and insinuations perpetrated against him.”

He said the university has not informed faculty members and students across campus about the official cancelation of the Ayers lecture.

“Many of our doctoral students and faculty members are still looking forward to Professor Ayers’s lecture on March 2, 2009,” said He. “Canceling Professor Ayers’ lecture is not merely a loss of an inspiring educational opportunity, nor only a matter of academic freedom, but a violation of human rights.”

Bill Schubert, a friend of twenty years and colleague of Ayers at the University of Illinois at Chicago, said “in view of the controversy over Bill Ayers’ invitation to speak at GSU [that] it is important that his twenty years of contributions to education -- inspiring educators to do good work -- be known.”

Terry Sanders, a GSU alumnus from the 1970s said she is very proud of her school for canceling his visit.

 “He is the same person he was 35 years ago and is attempting to legitimize himself and his actions through his position in higher education,” said Sanders.

Thompson said the recent increase in local controversy surrounding Ayers also had no bearing on the decision to cancel, but Ayers questioned the reasons why his lecture was canceled.

“The administration is telling you, you have a right. At the same time, they’re telling you, you don’t, by canceling,” Ayers said. “Don’t you find that hypocritical?”

The university maintained that the increased cost for security, in conjunction with over $500,000 in cuts for Student Affairs, made the speaker enviable.

Comments
Add New RSS
pathetic
wa 02-10-2009 07:21 pm CET

it's obvious gsu didn't want to risk the possibility of any negative pr with a lecture by ayers. this story could have been better though, it needed to give some more detail and context as to why ayers has been lecturing at universities and why he is still a credible academic source, sans last years media blitz about him.

why did the school agree to have him without initially taking into consideration the obvious extra security costs?

that's the real question and the real story that people should know about... the school obvious gave it a second thought and made up a convienent excuse to cancel his lecture
Geoff Carr 02-11-2009 08:50 am CET

You are making an incorrect assumption "Joe's Buddy" when you say Ayers and fellow Weather Underground members advocated violence against their fellow countrymen. The organization went to great lengths to make sure that any buildings or sites they bombed were empty. The only people who ever died because of a Weather Underground bombing were members of their own organization who died when a bomb they constructed prematurely detonated. They never targeted civilians; they never targeted government officials. I'm not condoning their actions, but after years of nonviolent protest had done little to change our government's position on the Vietnam War, they tried something else to get the government's attention. They never intended to take another person's life to achieve their goals; there were no "acceptable losses." Does our government provide the same courtesy when they decide to bomb foreign countries?
bomb 02-11-2009 01:01 pm CET

...in 1970, in which Weatherman member Ted Gold, Ayers' close friend Terry Robbins, and Ayers' girlfriend, Diana Oughton were killed when a nail bomb they were assembling exploded...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Ayers

The nail bomb is an anti-personnel explosive device packed with nails to increase its wounding ability. The nails act as shrapnel, leading almost certainly to greater loss of life and injury in inhabited areas than the explosives alone would. The nail bomb is also a type of flechette weapon. Such weapons use bits of shrapnel (ball bearings, nail heads, broken razors, darts and bits of metal) to produce a large radius of destruction.

Nail bombs are often used by terrorists, in particular by suicide bombers, since they cause large numbers of casualties when detonated in crowded places. Nail bombs can be detected via electromagnetic sensors and standard metal detectors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nail_bomb


----------------

put two and two together genius. and when our country bombs another, it's after hours of weighing options and it's probably for a pretty damn good reason; protecting us back at home and keeping our soldiers safe. i say that in comparison to sending them into a war zone where the enemies can also include civilians disassociated with any official militant force
Really?
Freedom 02-16-2009 09:54 am CET

Your right to be free ALSO gives me a right to be free from you.

Freedom of speech means that someone CAN speak out, but does not give a specific time or place. It simply states that you cannot be locked up, detained, or killed for comments made unlike other countries.

I back the decision to cancel his speech and I regret that GSU ever invited him to speak in the first place. I understand that there are a few very leftist people at the top making these decicisons, but I believe they made the right choice.

Just remember, those who can't, teach.
Joe's buddy 02-10-2009 07:45 pm CET

Cry me a river Mr. Ayers.

You advocate the use of violence, including the murders of your fellow countrymen, to secure your ideals.

And you have the gall to accuse the people who opposed your presence in their community as a "mob"? Typical liberal double-standard! You can kill and maim to achieve an outcome, but we can't make telephone calls or write letters.

The people who contacted GSU to express displeasure at your speech were not "a mob". Despite your cries of outrage, everyone opposed to your presense abided by the lawful rules of "NON-VIOLENT" protest. They did not use threats, they did not plant bombs, they did not give campus police a single reason to believe you were in danger.

Instead, they used non-violent protest tactics to effect an outcome they desired.

You should try it sometime. It works.
Idiot
Josh 02-15-2009 01:54 pm CET

Just to let you know, the people that did express displeasure did indeed make bomb threats as well as express other violent gestures against the school... hence the $13,000 in extra security.
Joe Lawrence, Esquire (GSU '96 02-10-2009 08:25 pm CET

"...to live up to our great tradition, we must remain an academic community where the free and open discussion of ideas, even those with which we strongly disagree, is possible."

The above quote from the St. Mary's president gets it exactly right.
How funny is it that now that the mob has gotten its way, they take issue with being labeled as a mob. If fact, Mr. Ayers hits the nail on the head when he calls out our administration for is hypocrisy, and outrageously anti-1st amendment cave-in. It's a sad day for GSU. My alma mater, a so-called institute of higher learning, just took the route as dictated to her by an ignorant and angry mob. Sad indeed.
The value of my diploma just took a hit, if nowhere else but in my heart.
The reactionaries, with their pathetically manufactured outrage, win again,......and free speech takes a shot to the gut.

(And for the last time, Bill Ayers didn't kill anybody. jesus christ, get your facts straight, you orwellian swine.)
Agreed...
The Noble Secret Order 02-11-2009 06:36 am CET

There have been rather heated discussions on this topic, more so than any speaker in recent memory. While I applaud the university for their scheduling Ayers to speak, I am saddened by their decisions to buckle to opposition extreme viewpoints.

Let no one fool you, that is precisely what is at work here. Ayers represents yet another extreme that I usually sum up as useless in it's entirety yet, like all other extremist stances, worth listening to for the nugget of truth that is usually lurking underneath the sludge of arrogance and egomania.

Like all other extreme approaches, Ayers philosophy seems to follow what I like to call "The Underpants Gnome paradigm":

Step 1. blow some things up, visiting violence upon violence.

Step 2. (???)

Step 3. Give people reason to consider your ideology as mentally sound.

In closing, I wish he had been granted a voice at Southern, and ultimately that people weren't so quick to ignore the message for their hostility.

It's a shame.
Wow
Josh 02-12-2009 08:48 am CET

Anti-First amendment? It is the first amendment that allowed us to speak out in this public institution to keep this whack dude off of our campus. As to the ignorant and angry mob, damn right i was angry. my school wanted to use my money to bring a man that has attacked (with more than just words) the same institution that provides us public schools and free speech. He doesn't deserve to be here. In my opinion, he should have lost his right to speak near any public institute when he attacked the government that promised him that right.
liberals have labeleled right wing groups threatening violence as fascists, racists, conservatives. What do you have for this guy. He took the actions to bomb my government's buildings. He deserves no respect, no audience. If you think its okay for him to speak on this campus using my money, then lets invite the KKK or some other extreme right wing group.
You think our school's administration would allow that? Would you call our administration anti-first amendment then? I think not.
Joe's Buddy's Son 02-10-2009 09:40 pm CET

I don't believe he said anything close to accusing Mr. Ayers of killing anybody. Something he was just short of in his long line of goals and aspirations...remained out of grasp after declaring war on the United States -cough *treason* cough- didn't really work out.

Joe Lawrence, you bring up a sad story I've become familiar with. You accuse us of becoming an angry and ignorant mob... yet the rest of you can't tell you're the mob. You wine and cry about free speech taking a hit, yet of course you can't hold yourself to the same standards when a conservative comes to speak and you feel oh so offended when he mentions anything you might find remotely different from your views. We're the mob? I don't recall anything past verbal, NON-violent protests. I don't recall the building or planting of bombs. Feel free to correct me, but I'm pretty sure there's plenty of evidence to prove he's the one that's gone so far to "make a point" in the name of "freedom of speech"

Freedom of speech? We had it, he had it, let him come and talk on his OWN dime.

By the way... I'd like to bring up his history in the bombing of the Pentagon.... who else in our nation's history has done anything of the sort? Who was it... Oh! Al Queda did just that! Attack the Pentagon! WHY IN THE HELL would anybody want to be associated with that? Your diploma took a hit? Well my student association with GSU didn't.

And to finish this up...congratulations going with the typical, pathetic, low class-liberal insult to our intelligence. You really set the bar high.
here's the point
wa 02-11-2009 04:53 am CET

while ayers' involvement with vietnam protesting groups is certainly questionable, it's about the academic and intellectual perspicacity that was held in high regard during his visits to gsu in years past (and at other universities btw) and that he is still able to offer students unique educational insight...that's the point...if you don't want to listen to what he has to say, don't. but don't make it impossible for others who do want to see him.

...and if he's going to be a popular guest speaker or lecturer, have the school defer the costs to the people that want to hear him speak and make it happen as opposed to just saying 'oh, it's just not in our security budget'.
Sorry state of argumentation skills
Theresa Welford 02-11-2009 06:21 am CET

It's mighty satisfying to call people names, but insults are not persuasive. In fact, they weaken even the strongest case. The hatemongers that pervade our society may be selling books and dominating our airwaves, but in my opinion they're also poisoning the atmosphere in the U.S. We should all study their techniques ... then work on doing the opposite of what they do. When we ignore evidence and facts that contradict our opinions, when we refuse to acknowledge that most issues are much more complex than we might want to think, when we throw around insulting names, when we try to "win" an argument by out-yelling those who disagree, we are not persuading others to reconsider their thinking. We are just appealing to those who already agree with us.
Outrageous
Annette Laing 02-11-2009 07:13 am CET

This is yet another example of how the administration at GSU uses and abuses the cost argument to crush anything that the clique who run the place do not wish to support. Please note that this decision will further erode the value of the GSU degree: Today it's Bill Ayers, but tomorrow it will be something else. The lack of freedom of speech on the campus is truly frightening, and the faculty are ruled by fear.
Where is our common ground?
Barbara Randolph 02-11-2009 08:59 am CET

I am deeply concerned about young minds on campuses of education who have not stretched their minds and frameworks far enough, perhaps, to consider the myriad facets of issues, instead of ping ponging between seeming opposite poles, possibly those etched into their minds when they could not reach the table. Some campus officials demonstrate a lack of courage.
What is the unvarnished truth of the situation with reference to cancellations of teachers such as Dr. Ayers and others? How is this unlike apartheid politics?

I am more disturbed that citizens of the United States of America consider dissenting opinions and active protests of wars and government policies and actions as "anti-democratic" or a "betrayal" of American democratic ideals and laws.

Why are the founders and writers of the Constitution still held up as heroes, as "founding fathers"? They were dissenters and protesters who took risks for the act of liberation. We have streets and roads and cities named for them.

To me, blindness has come upon us. Anger and fear seem to rule our airwaves and our mind channels. It is time to transcend our vivid past.

Dialogue needs to replace battle. Where is our common ground?
Joe Lawrence 02-11-2009 09:07 am CET

I can assure you all that my purpose here is not to "win" this argument. There is no winning arguments with the type of ignoramous that is for a ban on Ayers. I'm just here to vent and label you all the zealots that you are.
The fact is that Ayers has spoken on GSU's campus before. Only now, that the hannity's and rush's of the world have lied to the country about his link to President Obama, does this speaker draw a protest. That says it all.

I could not be more disgusted to be a Georgia Southern Eagle.
typical 02-11-2009 12:12 pm CET

again with the name calling...surprise surprise
Graduate student in curriculum studies
Mark Mohr 02-11-2009 10:06 am CET

One thing that I have learned as an educator is that when dialogue and conversation stops, so does learning. To silence a noted education scholar from speaking is a real loss for our students and our democratic educational process. I wish another solution could be found for the benefit of the university and those who want to learn.
familiar 02-11-2009 12:17 pm CET

LET HIM COME ON HIS OWN DIME!!!

other simply wish he doesn't come with our student fee money. let HIM bring his own security. he is saddened about GSU being afraid of mobs? why doesn't he just come on his own without GSU paying for it. let him speak on the football field, let him speak around campus. keep in mind many people may protest his words if they include any of his radical ideals, yet he would still have his freedom to speak.

we won't disregard his right to free speech, we just don't approve of who GSU planned on *paying* to have come to their campus.

YOU all get your facts straight
Joe Lawrence 02-11-2009 12:34 pm CET

It amazes me that you do not grasp the concept that Ayers being paid for his appearance has nothing to do with whether or not you and others are squelching free speech.
Is there really any question that this decision by the University will have a chilling effect on certain subjects for speech, or certain speakers coming here in the future?
That's what you self-righteous zealots do not get. This decision by Grube has implications that go far beyond this single instance. The precedent has been set which says that if a group of people stomp and shout enough, and threaten to pull back money, then the University will bow to their desires, regardless of the consequences to GSU students or the educational process in general.

finally speaking 02-11-2009 01:44 pm CET

joe, you never cease to amaze me. following your george ann activity has given me laughs and the occasional tear of how YOU (and so many others i might add) can miss the point(s) of such basic issues. you're making this too complicated. let him come speak as "familiar" said earlier. let him do it on his own. nobody will stop him, they can't. although the moment he mentions anything radical, protesting would definitely follow.

we might as well invite osama bin laden...
GSU being Anti-First Amendment? Are you kidding me
Jeff 02-11-2009 04:02 pm CET

Bill Ayers has all the right in the world to come to Georgia Southern and is more than welcome to take advantage of our campuses public forums...i.e: Rotunda. GSU would have no problem allowing this to happen, in fact, they couldn't stop it anyway. The simple fact is, he doesn't want to. There isn't any reason why our University should have to foot the bill for any visitor's security. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin never appeared on campus for the same reason. Where was the mob then?
Myles 02-11-2009 04:25 pm CET

Ok.... it seems like a bunch of people are missing the point and I'm glad the rest of you are pointing this out... Personally I am against his ideals but if he wants to come then he should get his happy ass on down, pay for HIS OWN SECURITY (I'm sure he's used to this), and quit crying about the first amendment and blah blah blah.... Personally I think whenever you commit treason against the country you should lose your rights as a citizen but that's why I'm not in politics. He should go hire his own security and then come back down to Southern and speak. Hell he can speak at the damned rotunda like every other crazy person in the South does. If you others want him to come so bad, why don't you get some money together and pay him to go down and speak? Hell, I'd even put some money towards that just so I can talk to him face to face.
!!! 02-11-2009 07:25 pm CET

HEAR HEAR!
Joe Lawrence 02-11-2009 06:02 pm CET

If other guests do not have to pay for their own security, then requiring Mr. Ayers to do so would be tantamount to silencing his speech. It's a really good try, by a bunch of non-lawyers, who truly have no idea about free speech and its nuances.
Nobody is claiming that Mr. Ayers has a case against the University for the denial of his first amendment rights. What they are saying is that what hapened this week, while within the letter of the law technically, is so far abound from being in the spirit fo free speech.
I'll say it again. It's not in the spirit of freedom and free speech when a mob shouts somebody down. You're not giving that individual a chance to speak, thus constructively denying him that right.
I really will never understand why a bunch of people who have no desire to hear a man speak, would give a damn if another group does. Like it or not, their is a segment of GSU's population that would've liked to hear what Ayers has to say on educational issues. Because of your zealotry, you denied those GSU students and alumni the chance to do so.
I'll just say this. Becareful what you wish for, because these types of things cut both ways. the next time, it will be a controversial conervative speaker coming to GSU. Perhaps the folks of differeing political persuassion will attempt to deny that person access to GSu's campus. Is that what you peopel want? Because that is exactly what happens with stuff like this. The path that you right wingers have taken us down with thih Ayers crap is a slippery slope. I just hope that my fellow sensible progressives will have the self-restraint to not see that event as a way to return your favor.
Viva la Tolerance.

( I can only wonder how long this nationalistic high, that most of you Anti-Ayers freaks are on, will last. Just a little FYI, just because you like Lee Greenwood and have a USA sticker on your Ford doesn't make you a better American than anyone else. Remember, our founding fathers were terrorists.)
Anonymous 02-11-2009 07:30 pm CET

we don't want to pay. get it through your head. he doesn't even have to hire security. he can even drive down on his own gas and spend a few hundred bucks and hours just doing that. you all can even chip in 10 bucks and spot him for gas.

amen to let him speak at the rotunda.

we don't care that he speaks, we simply don't want to pay for HIM. we wouldn't want to pay for any other low life who got off convictions.


no...here's an idea. why don't all of you ayers supporting lunatics just move out of the country? he doesn't like the way america is being run, so why don't you all just leave?

oh i think i might have the answer to that. cause no other country has the same freedoms america does! you try and pull this s*** anywhere else and you're screwed
Anonymous 02-12-2009 06:32 am CET

Who is "we"? If the majority of all the students who pay fees agree with you, then okay. There are over 17,000 fee-paying students at GSU. Poll them and then get back to me. Since when does minority rule?
Student Fees
Jenn 02-12-2009 08:13 am CET

our student fees are used all the time for things that the majority of students don't want or care about...there have been speakers that have not appealed to the majority of campus that WE payed for...the choice to attend the speech was on the individual so for those who are too close minded to listen they didnt have to attend.
Myles 02-12-2009 09:29 am CET

Some of our founding fathers also advocated slavery...
slave history 02-15-2009 09:03 pm CET

they set the groundwork for the abolition of slavery. if it wasn't for them, it may have taken centuries longer to abolish it
Anonymous 02-23-2009 07:42 am CET

had we only been so lucky....
Teachable Moments
Jonathan Harwell 02-12-2009 02:09 am CET

This event could still be held with Ayers speaking to the campus via satellite, without the need for security to protect him. GSU is well versed in delivering distance education, so this shouldn't be a challenge.
Myles 02-12-2009 09:29 am CET

Best idea to come from this whole thing.
Associate Professor
Michelle Haberland 02-12-2009 09:58 am CET

The majority of students and each of the faculty members that I have spoken with agree that the security costs were inflated so as to make the appearance seem infeasible. The costs included paying for bomb sniffing dogs. Indeed, these are the very same kind of tactics used by the mayors of southern cities like Selma and Birmingham in the Civil Rights movement. Simply refuse to issue the parade permit to the Southern Christian Leadership Council on “security” grounds. The security argument fails to hold any water when one considers two very important facts. First, Professor Ayers has spoken at other universities without these elaborate security arrangements. Second, Professor Ayers has been to Georgia Southern University before. Several times. He came to give presentations in association with the College of Education.

Since the security argument is obviously a sham, one can only conclude that the University feared the political outcry of a few blowhards. In the meantime, they denied my students an opportunity to hear what a very important, if controversial, historical figure had to say.
Point remains the same
Jeff 02-12-2009 01:23 pm CET

Inflated security costs or not, the point remains the same, Professor Ayers can schedule a time at the University's rotunda and rant all he wants. Those who want to hear him can, those who don't can simply walk by. If you're that upset about your students not having a chance to listen to what Mr. Ayers has to say, you can simply teach them how to write a letter, email, or view a video. Georgia Southern hasn't put a barrier in between he and his message. You can hear him speak every day if you follow this link: www.youtube.com...Heck, you could start every class with an Ayer's interview.
Well written article.
Jami Lyn 02-12-2009 09:16 am CET

Whether you agree with what GSU did or not, this is an amazing article. Good work Sade! You should definitely be writing more often.
Speaking of speech
Annette Laing 02-12-2009 03:59 pm CET

I'm fascinated that all of those who commented and support the administration's decision have done so anonymously. Where is the courage of your convictions?
I wonder now who else will be banned from speaking... It's particularly galling to me that during my 12 year teaching the career, the least informed students, those who slacked off homework and refused to read books, were also the most stridently right-wing. I can't help thinking that the rules go both ways: If you don't want to pay toward the paltry cost of bringing speakers to campus, perhaps I should decline to subsidize your educations--as I do with my taxes, and as I did as an underpaid professor.
Lance Sullivan 02-17-2009 05:25 pm CET

Well Prof. Laing I am not commenting anonymously. I was quoted in the article and I still feel the same way. I am not misinformed, I don't slack of in my work or in class and I love to read. Why would you degrade your students this way? Being conservative does not make you a poor student. For you to say such things is troubling and shows how you feel towards those who don't agree with your politics.
Let's call a spade a spade!
Ridiculous 02-12-2009 05:04 pm CET

This is really ridiculous, first of all the people who made the face book group and the old, old, old alumni who where in the George-Anne aren’t the only people that count. Many other people pay student fees and wanted our money to go towards it. The school didn’t cancel anything when our money went to a homosexual drag show event last year, and I didn’t want my fees to go to that. There are many event’s on campus some of us don’t want our fees to go to but the money is collective and so our the fees that come out my pocket as well as yours, if you didn’t want to see him you should have stayed home. Let's call a spade a spade, this isn't about Bill Ayers, because we all know Georgia Southern and everyone else knew about this mans history the last few times he was invited here. This is about bitter republicans in this racist state that can’t get past Obama being their president. They have lost that trophy so now they intend to rummage around on the ground looking for crumbs, any minor victory will suffice and now they have one, Ayers. Congratulations! Since a majority of republicans can no longer be openly hostile about the new president, the one's at this school have turned their attention to the next best thing...the over publicized terrorist from over three decades ago. Everyone who joined the face book hate group, grow up…mature, take all that free time and, GO BE PRODUCTIVE! Study! Read! Anything!
Joe Lawrence 02-12-2009 07:48 pm CET

Annette Laing, thank you so much for putting is so clearly. Your comments about your right-wind students are hilarious, because it is so true. The people who have posted here anonymouly are indeed cowards, but not just for simply going nameless. They are truly cowards because they are afraid of people like Mr. Ayers, who don't fit into their slick, pre-packaged idea of what it means to be an american patriot.
Most of them do not even know that it is simply fear that motivates their actions against Ayers. Their existence on our campus is the best argument that I have ever heard for raising academic standards.

Where is professor Debra Sabia when you need her? From what I remember about her, she would've never put up with this crap. She is a heroic professor if there ever was one.
$13,000???
Jack in Virginia 02-14-2009 02:41 pm CET

Administration officials claim security costs could be upwards of $13,000.

Sterilizing the environment after that gasbag called Bill Ayers spews his venomous anti-American hatred would cost three times that much in catastrophe cleanup.

The only one well-served by a Bill Ayers visit is the local ServPro franchisee.

Kudos to the GSU Administration for recognizing that Bill Ayers outlived his usefulness in the late 1940s.

As for all of you b****ing and whining about the Administration stifling free speech, Bill Ayers is still allowed to walk onto campus and speak his mind...at his own risk.

Would love to see how receptive you'd be to having Ann Coulter step foot inside Bulloch County.

Let the gnashing of teeth begin.
Professor Ayers Not Allowed to Come to GSU
Michelle Haberland 02-17-2009 04:27 am CET

Please allow me to correct a misunderstanding. Professor Ayers is NOT allowed on the Georgia Southern campus. Vice President Theresa Thompson explained to those in attendance at yesterday's Faculty Senate meeting that he could not come anywhere on campus, including the so-called Free Speech Zone at the Rotunda.

Should you have any questions about that, please don't ask me. I suggest you direct your queries to Vice President Thompson.
You sure about this?
Jeff 02-17-2009 08:21 am CET

Obviously I didn't attend the meeting and have no idea what was said but... Even if Vice President Thompson made such a comment, can it actually be enforced? I was under the assumption (from Law/Ethics) that the only controls placed on a public forum are Time, Place, and prevention of any obscene material.. Once a medium has been used without regard to content, as has the Rotunda through the years, it becomes an open forum available for anyone to speak. To deny such a right would be grounds for a court case. So, regardless of what was said, I have to believe Mr. Ayers could schedule a time to come speak. If turned down, THEN and ONLY THEN will I take a stand against our University. Any attempt to deny someone their first amendment right is unconstitutional. As of now, GSU has not done that.
Yes, I'm Sure
Michelle Haberland 02-24-2009 12:04 pm CET

Yes, I'm sure that at the last meeting of the Faculty Senate, Vice President of Student Affairs Thompson said that Professor Ayers could not come to the Rotunda, the Free Speech Zone, and speak. The minutes of the meeting should reflect that assertion, but they won't be made available for some time. In the meantime, you could ask other Faculty Senators who attended the meeting for verification. Or you could just drop Vice President Thompson a line.
Bring Professor Ayers to GSU
Michelle Haberland 02-14-2009 04:03 pm CET

I'm writing to let you know about an online petition that seeks to get the administration to reconsider its decision to cancel Professor Bill Ayers' presentation to our university community.


This is an opportunity to get your voices heard.

You can find the petition at http://www.PetitionOnline.com/AyersGSU/petition.html .

If you are inclined to do so, please forward this to as many folks as possible. The petition will be presented to President Grube at the Faculty Senate meeting on the afternoon of Monday, February 16th. The more signatures received by 3pm on Monday, the better the chances of making a difference.

Peace,
Michelle Haberland
Petition
Jack, GSU '89 02-15-2009 03:25 am CET

Michele, when you present to President Grube the petition which will undoubtedly be signed by an overwhelming majority of students, I'm certain you'll also request that administrators spend student activity fees to balance the debate with the likes of Ann Coulter, Neal Boortz or Professor Mike Adams.
Anonymity again?
Annette Laing 02-15-2009 01:02 pm CET

I see that Jack, GSU and Jack in Virginia (who for all I know are the same person) have opted not to give their full names. How contemptibly gutless.
Ayers was not invited to talk about the events of 40 years ago, but in the area of his expertise, which is educational theory. There is nothing to prevent anyone on campus from requesting and receiving funding for legitimate academic speakers who represent various viewpoints. And FYI, I know that Dr. Haberland is firmly committed to education, not to propaganda, and to the free exchange of ideas, as was I when I still had the misfortune of working at GSU. Indeed, even as an undergrad, I remember vigorously objecting to protests against Linus Pauling's speaking on campuses, even though I found his views on race repugnant.
Chobin Hood 02-21-2009 05:46 am CET

Let's not forget that GSU is a business. For businesses, the bottom line is money, not high and/or noble standards. No, the appearance of standards is only for the attracting of more money, and that facade will be dropped at the slightest hint of future inconvenience.
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."